Basically yes, your track is disqualified.
Man if you uploaded it earlier you would have time to fix it before deadline, now he can not let you edit it since it is not fair towards other participants.
Life is a bitch sometimes.

maybe its unfair, but i am for letting them fix it

It doesn't matter how many people think it's ok to let them fix it. It might sound and also be harsh, but rules are rules. Even in a fun cup like the mtc, they're not meant to be broken.

The official ManiaExchange MTC June 2015 results are here.



This time it was so close that we have two winners
Congratulations Voyager006 and Zengo. This is real high level competition.
"MTC - Slopekogel by   Zengo - "I really dig the ideas here, especially the hairpin wall."
"Vibes -mtc- by   Voyager006 - "I saw many unique transitions and overall you fit the theme really well!"
Congratulatons to Zack11, you made it on the podium as well, right behind 1st and 1st place
"E|D|G|E (MTC) by   Zack11 - " Really fun and entertaining to drive. Impressive MT work."
Have fun with your showcase guys.
(Sorry that there's no results video this time, but sometimes time is a rare good )

If you're interested in all the comments, read them here.

Thanks for all your numerous submissions and votes. I think this was the biggest MTC we had in a long time, which feels amazing

ლ(ಥ_ಥლ)

gg

three 1's on firestorm's map? wtf?

also why did idan801 give so many 10's? that could really mess with the results

why doesn't this apply to judges anymore, might I ask? http://tm.mania-exchange.com/threads/958?postid=13572

Denny epic voting

Dont know if its possible to make a rule for this but I feel like it shouldnt be allowed to give every track bad scores except of one.
Anyways, nice mtc!

Space, this classical way of judging maps failed many times in the past due to a lack of judges. It was very difficult or impossible to find 5 judges, who will judge all maps.
That's why I introduced the simple system of voting. I know that it is not perfect (because the perfect system does not exist) and it can seem unfair, especially when you look at individual votes. But with a higher vote number this can actually still work out, because each individual vote has a smaller impact. (e.g. one bad vote out of five
total votes has a bigger effect than one bad vote out of 20.) After all it is the combined result that counts and not the result of a single vote. Even in a judging committee opinions can vary

Golo, I see your point, but what if one gives bad votes to all tracks except of two, or three or four? Where is the limit between an obvious manipulation or a regular voting with strong opinions. And if we add many rules to cover all exceptions and cases, we end up with a complicated system again. (just take a look at statute book )
I wouldn't mind adding one additional rule, if it really helps, but I don't known a good one at the moment. So I keep relying on the common sense that everyone gives fair votes. I also think that it helps to publish the votes in detail because nobody wants to be that guy giving unfair votes. (I hope )