Ok Zenit, time to listen like I was
Navi:
First things first, it's bad sport insulting a moderator. But I'm not here to discuss this. I say it as general warning tho.
Second of all, I don't look at author when judging a track. Your track was genuinely ass to me. If you try to imply otherwise, you certainly don't know me. I actually talked a lot of shit to gado with his track, and if you look at the results, he's actually second, because his track was well built. I've had earlier MTCs when someone whose mapping I love made a particularly bad track and his score went to shit. It happens. Deal with it.
Side note: eyebo and lolig liked it better than me, that's ok, it also happens. That's why we have several judges. I've never been a fan of trial maps and I had to loop around the same 5 seconds of yours 75 times because you couldn't bother to put a fucking checkpoint on landing. That's bad design in my book. So obviously I found your track not fun, because I kept fucking up in the same place after having done things properly, I found it unpolished, because you could've noticed that sequence and put a checkpoint, and a bad route design for the reasons stated.
If I were to give you a bad score because it's you, I don't fuck around with that bullshit. I give straight zeroes to people. Or find some foolishness to straight DQ you.
Third, yours is the second trial entry to MTC like ever, first being gado's. At least that I can remember. Probably because a good trial track takes more than 15 days to build. Probably because most trial tracks won't fit in the time directive which was actually enforced back in the day. Probably because it's easier to judge a good race map, and contestants want this gold. I agree that it's not on the rules, but you're potentially looking at a lower score because you're putting a higher difficulty on yourself. I also entered a contest with a "lol" map once (more like a trollmap), the endurance one back in TMUF. It got 2 points. So I have it much worse than you and I don't go around pointing fingers.
Plus, trial maps are polarizing. You either like them or you don't. There's no middle ground. At least in my experience.
Second side note, notice the author time in gado's map. His track is outside that time constraint, but at least it feels finished. Yours, to me, didn't.
Fourth, why would I hold a grudge against you for like 7 months just to give you a bad score? I have a life, even if not too active. Ain't nobody got time for that.
Fifth, I could apologize for the lack of judges, but it's not only my problem. We were already short on judges before willow disappeared and our other judge bailed out. My judging had been done since June except for gado's track and yours, which I decided to leave for when we had judges to do it. Summer came and went, I actually went pretty inactive on TM and forgot about this. When time came to do the advent calendar, the results were suggested as one of the days and I got two judge requests from that. And that's when I finished judging. It was late November at this point actually.
As I said, I have a life, and other hobbies. Those got in the way. For that I apologize. Not to you in particular, but to everyone including you.
Last but not least: Why are you attacking me? Because I had other things to do? Because you didn't win? Without my scores you'd be 6th, and only half a point over 7th. Not precisely top 3. Because you think I judged that way because of you? I already said I didn't in this post.
If it's because of something that doesn't
directly have to do with me or who I am, I suggest you take that shit elsewhere. And if it's because of this contest, then I'm sad to say that you're stupid,
because you already forgot about it so it's
really not that important for you.
Anything else to say to
me personally, take it to PM because that's why they're there. Kindest regards,
FT»Osaka