Bucky says:
I'm not going to discuss a rating system anymore. I've made my thoughts on the subject quite clear in at least one other thread. It's been thoroughly discussed before, 1. and I haven't heard of any plans for implementing such a system.
2. I still believe that you should not judge a track by the amount of downloads it has, and that it would not be very accurate if the site did so.
1. we talked about it so i hope it come
2. lol, i say a lowest download list (unoticed tracks get a second chance.) not botw list..
because if you have 10 different cakes and we need to find the best, we need to taste all, right ?
and in mx we have 1000 untested cakes and to find the tastiest so we must try them. and with a "lowest download windows" we can taste more by a coincidence.